Looking for a specific film review? CLICK BELOW

0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z / Trailers / DVD Store


March 14, 2009
Movie Trailer: Harvard Beats Yale 29-29
"This game was never going to be forgotten...ever."

Yeah, that's because the Ivy League jerks from the 60's won't stop talking about themselves. Can't wait to see yet more baby boomers talking about their youth. Perhaps if you losers were better stewards of the culture and society in general I'd be more inclined to listen to you instead of wanting slap you until you cried. Everything we've stood for has caused deep and widespread decay in all avenues of American life, but hey - the sixties were great! Me, me, me, more me now!


Then again, I'm probably a tad biased. Watch the trailer and make up your own mind if this looks like something worth seeing.




Return to the movie trailers page


Director: Kevin Rafferty
Actors: Tommy Lee Jones (The Fugitive)




Labels: , , ,



Share






October 28, 2008
The Fugitive (1993)
Should I see it?
Yes.



A solid thriller that is very comfortable in it's own shoes. It doesn't try to be more than a by-the-numbers thriller. The script is perfectly lean and direct. This the strength of the film, it is unencumbered by notions of being an important work and focuses on being an entertaining on.

Critics fawning over Tommy Lee Jones' performance is a little over-the-top, he's not exactly performing Hamlet as Marshal Samuel Gerard. Gerard is a well written character and Jones is a custom fit in the role but he's not recreating the wheel. Jones does carry much of the film and his driving performance does raise the production up. Opposite him, the film's intended star, Harrison Ford provides enough of his Indiana Jones mugging techniques (read tricks) to make this a fun watch. This was made back in the day when he could still perform a fight sequence without looking like an over-the-hill grandpa reliving his glory days.

If you haven't seen this yet it is good enough to hunt down and watch. If you have seen it before it has enough life in it to sustain multiple viewings. It's one of those movies that has enough going on to give back to the audience over time. You won't be disappointed and may just be surprised how well it has held up over the years.



Related Reviews:
Harrison Ford movies
Clear and Present Danger (1994)
Firewall (2006)


Other Critic's Reviews:
Christian Spotlight on the Movies
Popcorn Pictures


Labels: , , , ,



Share






October 5, 2008
Movie Trailer: The Fugitive
Very strong film and well worth seeing at least once. This trailer for the film however is lacking. The set up is good, Tommy Lee Jones is commanding and gives a good example of his performance - but what is with the shaving? Sure, I can see having a shot of ol' Harry Ford getting rid of the beard but coming back to the shot three times? It makes it seem like it's a critical part of the plot, as if it were meaningful. Why wouldn't they end the shot of him walking into a crowd of people and disappearing amongst the waves of humanity? How is that less compelling than watching Ford perform an act of hygiene in a gas station bathroom?





Screenwriter: Jeb Stuart (Die Hard) and David Twohy (Below)
Director: Andrew Davis (Holes)
Actors: Harrison Ford (Firewall), Tommy Lee Jones (No Country for Old Men), Sela Ward (The Day After Tomorrow) and Julianne Moore (Blindness)


Labels: , , , ,



Share






April 28, 2008
No Country For Old Men (2007)
***Cross-posted on CATHOLIC MEDIA REVIEW***


Should I see it?

Yes (with cautions)

Short Review: Great until the final act and then it gets very muddled. It’s like getting great, scenic directions to grandma’s house but once you get there, instead of seeing Grandma’s house, you’re left parked in front of a closed down petting zoo that is being used to hold practices for the local bomb squad. Sure it’s interesting but didn’t someone promise we’re going to grandma’s?




The Coen Brothers' intricate film is beautifully shot, and eloquently written film but it is also marred by their tendency towards self indulgence. They are simply the worst at ending their movies. Their final acts almost always descend into strange musings that are incompatible with the rest of the story. I contend the reason they tend to flounder is because they’re not actually telling stories, they’re describing people. They get so involved in their characters
that they forget to propel their narrative into a resolvable direction. In the case of this film, they frankly abandon telling the story and wander off to investigate the ethical issues that curse their characters. It's a little like seeing someone works on a complicated mathematical problem on a chalkboard, only to have them wipe the slate clean before giving you the sum and then begin working on a related problem. If you’re into closure or traditional endings, this film will leave you wanting.

Even with its stuttering resolution, this is a remarkable piece of cinema. It is clearly deserving of all of the awards and praised it has received. Every aspect of the film is m
asterfully handled and shows a dedication to intricate filmmaking that is a pleasure to witness. The story revolves around three men. Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin), a gruff welder, stumbles across the results of a drug deal gone bad in the desert. From this he discovers and keeps a case containing two million dollars. He takes it home to his simple wife Carla (Kelly MacDonald). It isn’t long before the menacing killer Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem, in an Oscar winning performance) arrives in the area, looking to get the lost loot. Chigurh, with a devil’s smile and a patient, yet frightening, tone tracks down Moss across Texas. He gives the feeling of being supernatural, a symbol more than a man, more on that in a bit. As Chigurh pursues Moss, the killer…well, kills. He leaves a trail of dead hotel clerks, criminals and random people on the road. On this trail, old, crusty sheriff Ed Tom Bell (Tommy Lee Jones) struggles to make sense out of the nonsensical deaths caused by Chigurh’s efforts. This may not seem like a foundation for a great film. In many cases, the story itself is rather pedestrian. Where this movie strikes its cord is in character and in the choices made by the Coens.

This is one of the best character pieces made in recent memory. It is a rare thing to be presented with characters so intensely interesting that there’s a sense of loss when long scenes of dialog end. I wanted to see more about these people, learn more about them. This careful character construction makes the confrontations more tense since the audience is involved on both ends of the fight. When Moss and Chigurh finally meet and fight, I found mys
elf hoping for a draw so the film could continue. I can’t think of the last time this has happened.

This is a fantastic movie that I cannot recommend it highly enough. You have two master filmmakers at the height of their skills working with a cast that meets the high expectations of a brilliant script. What more could you ask for?

Click below to view the trailer

Cautions:
This is an incredibly violent movie. It is a study of evil and that evil is expressed in blood. This sanguine film doesn’t push the gore to an unreasonable level and the violence, while quite rough, is handled with respect. It’s not there for the sake of showing something exciting; it goes to build the story. In other words, it’s excusable. This said, it is important for those who are sensitive to seeing violent images to be forewarned that this film is loaded with brutal killings.


Worldview:
The film is a search for structure (read God) in this seemingly random world. Two of the main characters, Ed Tom Bell and Anton Chigurh struggle with meaning in different ways. Sheriff Ed Tom Bell tries to think his way to an explanation. He sees the results of men’s dark hearts and the disconnected path of violence. Confronted with this, Bell attempts to keep order and attempts to reason. He fails and ultimately gives up the cause by saying “I always figured when I got older, God would sorta come into my life somehow. And he didn't. I don't blame him. If I was him I would have the same opinion of me that he does.

Anton Chigurh himself is a remorseless killing machine. In a sense he is much like The Terminator since once he begins on a path to kill someone he does not stop until the task is done. At one point however, a fellow killer says of Chigurh when Moss says he will make a deal with the killer “You don't understand. You can't make a deal with him. Even if you gave him the money he'd still kill you. He's a peculiar man. You could even say that he has principles. Principles that transcend money or drugs or anything like that. He's not like you. He's not even like me.” Chicurh, acts as a grim reaper, slowly but surely coming to claim each soul. He is lost, however, in a meaningless world of death. Casually peddles death seems to be a way for him to define certainty in a strange way. In the film’s best scene, Chicurh confronts a dim-eyed shop owner and has the man call a flipped coin. If the man wins, he lives, if he loses, Chigurh will kill him. Chigurh states about the 1958 coin “It's been traveling twenty-two years to get here. And now it's here. And it's either heads or tails. And you have to say. Call it.” The coin, fate (God) decides the outcome to this man’s life, not Chigurh. He never makes the jump that it is his choice whether to kill or not. He doesn’t recognize that it is not fate but rather his choice to flip the coin in the first place which defines him. God may put him in the situation, but his reaction to it is the key. At the end of the film, and if you haven’t seen the film please stop here because I’m going to give away important parts of the plot, Moss’ wife Carla confronts Chigurh face to face. Chigurh, in a moment of mercy, allows her the flip of a coin to decide her fate.

Carla Jean Moss: You don't have to do this.
Anton Chigurh: [smiles] People always say the same thing.
Carla Jean Moss: What do they say?
Anton Chigurh: They say, "You don't have to do this."
Carla Jean Moss: You don't.
Anton Chigurh: Okay.
[
Chigurh flips a coin and covers it with his hand]
Anton Chigurh: This is the best I can do. Call it.
Carla Jean Moss: I knowed you was crazy when I saw you sitting there. I knowed exactly what was in store for me.
Anton Chigurh: Call it.
Carla Jean Moss: No. I ain't gonna call it.
Anton Chigurh: Call it.
Carla Jean Moss: The coin don't have no say. It's just you.
Anton Chigurh: Well, I got here the same way the coin did.

Carla demands Chigurh acknowledge his freewill, his culpability in her murder, in all of his murders. He can’t make the leap, if he comes to admit his actions are of his own making, he is then guilty, an active player in this world and not some random device. Earlier in the film he refers to himself as a “perfect tool for the job”, the job being to kill another person. Chigurh finds his heels stuck in the swamp of a completely fate based world. If man is directed completely by fate then he is nothing more than a tool, a mere function. With freewill, choice, man ignites the sometimes terrible consequence of randomness on the world but he can also be judged for the decisions he makes.


Related Reviews:
Coen Brothers movies
Miller's Crossing (1990)
Intolerable Cruelty (2003)
The Ladykillers (2004)


Other Critic's Reviews:
Dear Cinema
Popcorn Junkies



Labels: , , , , , , ,



Share