At first blush I want to claim that a person's expectation of enjoying this film is directly proportional to their general intelligence. This gimmick-flick is the stuff that enthralls air-headed high school kids and slow-witted college dorm rats.

Truth be told, I enjoyed it. I didn't love it. I'm not proud of even liking it. As much as I would like to spend this review absolutely destroying this movie, I can't. The stupid thing did its job.

The premise is simple enough. Take Blair Witch Project, make the actors better dressed but just as hollow, and hold the proceedings in someones brother's suburban house. The movie shows the home video of Katie and Micah, two vapid dopes who are being threatened at night by a mysterious demonic presence. As the footage piles up from the couple filming their experiences, the attacks by the presence become more aggressive and spooky. Then things pretty much go as expected.

I think the reason I enjoyed the film so much is because writer/director Oren Peli has provided one of the best examples of working with what's available. Peli has next to nothing as far as resources on screen. His actors are lame, his premise is worn and the film is shot on the cheap. Even with these restrictions he is very clever in how he presents the demonic force and builds tension. I have applaud the inventive solutions he finds to cover for his lack of funds and resources.

Simply enjoying a film isn't enough however. The downside to the film is the character's reactions to their dilemma. Katie is being personally attacked by a demonic force. What do they do? Do they confer with a religious figure? Nope. Do they attempt a exorcism? Nope. Do they burn the house down and move to Idaho? Nope. They bring in some feckless local psychic who does nothing to alleviate their problem.

If Peli had taken the demonic force more seriously on a metaphysical level, the film could have found some depth. As it stands, we're basically watching two morons being tormented more by Peli's need to remain under budget than by the demon in the script. The thing is, sometimes it is fun watching morons being tormented.

Peli has no problem broaching the use of demonic elements but can't commit and bring things full circle. Having the characters deal with a demon but then avoid even discussing the theological ramifications of their predicament simply isn't real. Even the most ardent atheist would have to ponder things given the situation. Avoiding the subject of God here has to be an intentional omission and it shows Peli wasn't willing to fully work his material.


Note: If you're being harassed by a demonic force here are some tips:

1. Don't immediately decide to film the events and remain isolated in your bedroom
2. Don't bring in a psychic. You'll just have some former pothead wandering through your home wide-eyed claiming that there is a "presence" and it "wants you to pay twenty more dollars to hear what it has to say."
3. Do bring in the authorities - a CHRISTIAN priest or pastor. You know, someone who can actually help.


Related Reviews:
Low budget movies
Bella (2006)
Primer (2004)


Other Critics Reviews:
The Film Reel
ScreenRant

Labels: film, ghosts, movie review

Short Review: A horror movie without the horror - and that's actually a good thing.


This is one of my favorite films. Consisting of four Japanese ghost stories with fantastic set work and mouth-dropping cinematography, this film is a rare treat. This is a different kind of horror movie. The four short films are less about the characters being haunted by ghosts than by their own pain, guilt and burdens. This is less a series of horror stories and more of a samurai Twilight Zone.

If you are a fan of The Ring or The Grudge, and you don’t mind subtitles, this film may work for you. This is the grandfather of these films. As with Ringu (the original Japanese version of The Ring) the stories all slowly build to satisfying conclusions. This differs to most horror films made in the West today, which are in a hurry to get to the gore and are almost never satisfying.

The four stories are as follows:



This is a simple story about a poor samurai who abandons his young bride and lives to regret it. The first of the films shown, this story is a perfect set up for the remainder of the movie. The dark, brooding story is presented in equally morose scene work and lighting. The story is simple and offers an easy introduction to the strange worlds the film offers. If you’re unsure about watching a foreign film, I would suggest trying out this first story to see if the film will match your tastes. You must remember however, the point is not to be scared – these films are far from frightening. It is about character and story not cheap thrills.



This film shows the visual brilliance of Yoshio Miyajima’s cinematography. Even if you’re not thrilled by the narrative content of the film, the scenery may just keep you watching. This section tells the tale of a poor woodcutter who survives a run-in with a vicious demon in the woods. The woodcutter promises the demon he will not tell a soul about their encounter in exchange for his life. Years later we find out what happens when the woodcutter breaks his oath.

This portion of the film builds on the ground laid in The Black Hair. Where The Black Hair is soaked in darkness and brooding scenery, this short film is glowing with the shine of snow and the haunting glares of eyes literally looking down from the sky.

The eyes in the sky I mention may indicate to you that this is a visually odd movie – it is. The films are clearly shot on sound stages. There are obvious backdrops and very theatrical lighting. It is amazing but the backdrops and intruding lighting and scenery actually work to improve the film. The fake sets offer a strangeness and falseness to the worlds that only serve to set the character’s lives further off kilter.



This is the reason you'd watch the movie. From the absolutely enthralling battle sequences to the creepy ghost story that follows, this piece carries the whole film.

The battle sequence may not be for everyone. Again, we have a scene presented on a sound stage in front of easily identifiable backdrops. The battle is surreal and dreamlike rather than realistic. In a stroke of genius, the narrated battle sequences are inter-cut with images from paintings of battles. The ancient paintings support the strange visuals of the battle (the disjointed colors, the backdrop, the sharp angles, etc.) It is as if you’re watching a sort of living painting of a battle long since over.

The remainder of the film centers on Hoichi, a blind monk who is lured by the lost souls of the ancient battle to their hidden temple. At the temple Hoichi plays songs to the souls of the great war. Hoichi is seduced by the lost soul’s flattery and respect but at what cost to his life?

I simply cannot offer enough praise of this portion of the film. This part of the film blew me away with its story and its design. You can scoff at the rest of this film, but this section will command you attention. This is simply brilliant film making and this section will show why this film won the Jury Special Prize at 1965 Cannes Film Festival.



This is the weakest of the four stories. This simple little ditty is about a man keeps seeing the image of a smiling ghost looking back at him in his drinking cups. Soon the smiling ghost and his cohorts descend upon the haunted man.

This section of the film is disappointing. Like the other portions of the film it is a joy to watch for its look and the great acting, but the story itself is lacking.



This classic film is a pleasure to watch if you have an ounce of film geek in your veins. If you’re one who doesn’t get into foreign films (foreign in this case meaning non-Western based) and/or hates subtitles you’re best just moving on. Personally, this is one of the better films I’ve seen in months. I would place this in one of the better films ever made.


Related Reviews:
Japanese films
Samurai 1: Musashi Miyamoto (1954)
Sword of Doom (1966)



Other Critic's Reviews:
Combustible Celluloid
The Criterion Contraption

Labels: film, ghosts, horror, Japanese cinema, movie review

The Unwatchable.

Anna (Emily Browning) returns home after some time in a mental institution only to find her dad has taken in an cranky wife. On top of this unpleasant unpleasant surprise, the teen is being visited by the dead. This is a very conventional, and somewhat boring horror flick. It is reminiscent of a dozen other similar films and follows all the expected paths (An American Haunting, Watcher in the Woods, and The Haunting in Connecticut to name some).



Related Reviews:
Ghost movies
El Orfanato “The Orphanage” (2007)
Ghost Town (2008)


Other Critic's Reviews:
Film Jerk
Roger Ebert

Labels: Elizabeth Banks, Emily Browning, film, ghosts, horror, Jason Statham, movie review