Today's thoughtful retort comes from Brian. Here is his reaction to my review of Avatar.


Obviously, you are a radical right wing Republican with no sense of decency. This film, if you actually took the time to think about it, shows the evils of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Rove, Haliburton, Blackwater, and Big Oilm (sp) of course in a different context because if James Cameron showed them instead, he would be put in Guantanamo Bay with the other innocent, non-Christian, indigenous peoples of the Middle East that dare dissent from Bush's illegal wars on dark-skinned peoples who don't bow to that Jesus fellow or read the fictinal (sp) Bible and act like it is fact. Plus, look at how much you care about the use of the word race. Obviously, you didn't vote for Obama and don't support him because he is black.

I saw this movie and it was as brilliant as any Orwell story. I think every American should see it and understand the context. If the redneck cracker homophobe racist sexist nd (sp) Islamophobic Republicans don't like it, they shouldn't go see it.



The Christ = "that Jesus fellow"

"If the redneck cracker homophobe racist sexist nd (sp) Islamophobic Republicans don't like it, they shouldn't go see it."

I'm an independent redneck cracker homophobe racist sexist and Islamophobic, so I guess I'm cleared to watch the movie again.

"Obviously, you didn't vote for Obama and don't support him because he is black. "

Well, that's half right. What can I say, I'm blameless. I voted for the American.

*snark*

OK, let’s hash this out a bit because I’ve been getting tons of comments and my post has become the topic on a number of forums. Which is one of the reasons I posted this comment in the first place. The main reason is because I have a fondness for sharing comments from hyperventilating lefties.

Yes, I am a Christian
Yes, I am a conservative
No, I don’t hate the Earth
Yes, I loathe liberal-minded movies that don’t have the common decency to bury their agenda.

Avatar has a rudimentary script that is far below what should be expected from someone with James Cameron’s resume. The story is terrible. Even forgiving the open-faced social marketing Cameron peddles in, the actual plot, the substance of his screenplay is sophomoric.

Cameron intended to make a political/social statement with this film. Pointing out his flawed thinking and the inherent racist ideology that is threaded through the film is not only fair game, it is compulsory. Any critic that focuses merely on the historic aspect of the technical advancements this film makes is not doing their job. It doesn’t matter if the car is some fancy new mode of transportation if it drives you off a cliff.

Had the story been better my review would have been better. I welcome you to all to search my reviews, available above. You will find numerous reviews of films that have political agendas that I do recommend even though the politics made me ill.
I hope this clears things up.

Labels: comment of the day, miscellaneous

Normally, I get kicked in the knees by foul heathen trolls snitting and snorting about this and that. Today, I received a delightful blurb from a Christian reacting to my review to Gran Torino.

You know its going to be a long day when you wake up and find a comment waiting to be moderated by someone who goes by the name of GOD PREFERS JUDGMENT. You read that handle and you know you're in for something. Here is GPJ's comment:

"I have not used your service much but I always liked your frank answers on what we should or should not see, but today, as I looked for what you might recommend, I found out, not only are you no different then the rest of the "Christian" reviewers, you are in fact, (Because of this one review,) THE WORST! Like ALL other “Christian” reviewers, you have decided the one and easiest thing of God’s heart He asks us to follow, is not necessary, which only makes the rest of God’s Heart even more unimportant to today's apostate Christian majority.

From what we gather from other reviewers who seem to "like" this filth, there are some TWENTY PLUS disrespectful, God hating, worldly mockeries of Jesus’ name, along with six plus uses of God “damning” people and other things. (Even by a perverted imitation of a hollywood priest.)Despite that, most reviewers stopped trying to count the use of the F word after FIFTY and guess it was about 75. All in all, the Christians you send to this filth will hear on average 3 filth's per minute. Great food for all those spiritless Christians?

Despite all that, your idea that Christians should spend money to see how bad the world has become is yet another atrocity to the Kingdom. How about (instead) you simply tell them to go to their nearest city and watch the naked perverts sodomize each other in the streets, (LEGALLY) during one of their Pride Parades. They might even be treated by witnessing IDIOT parents who bring their children to see this abomination. THAT might begin to wake people up and force them to face the fact, THEY ARE LOSING THE BATTLE WHILE sitting on their collective rear-ends playing the sickening “tolerant Christian, while their children and grandchildren are recruited by the sodomite agenda and DIE of AIDS. GOOD NEWS? I don’t think so!

We research this filth, and YES CHRISTIAN, before your children and grandchildren are RECRUITED and KILLED by the sodomites; IT'S TIME TO GET ANGRY AND FIGHT BACK!"


Uh...fight back? We really need to define exactly what you mean by fight back.

Wow, this review of mine must really suck. Its so bad its erased all of the good I've otherwise done. That's one crappy review!

In regards to the language, I didn't go in with a clipboard and start counting the foul remarks. They are there, that's for sure. The use of g-damn and using Jesus' name in vein is a part of the dialog of the film. Should I warn people of these usages? Probably. Then again, I figured R-Rating may be a tip off that there's questionable material displayed. The use of cursing is in context, these people would use it in real life and while I find it unfortunate it is used here, it is realistic. I also don't expect non-Christian film makers* to adhere to Biblical laws. My viewing someone using curse words isn't sinful. Its not sinful for me to recommend the film either given that I believe it will not lead anyone towards anything disruptive. Under GPJ's logic Christians shouldn't approve of Shakespeare, Hitchcock, Spielberg or other artists who have produced works that are not in line with strict Biblical teaching. Now, one can argue that using the Lord's name in vein is a big issue given that its one of those Commandments and everything. True. Which is why I try not to use the phrases myself and expect my Christian brothers and sisters to refrain as well.

Where GPJ loses me is equating seeing this film with having children view men having anal sex in public. I like hyperbole as much as the next guy but methinks you've stepped out a tad too far with this one. You're nailing me on the whole g-damn thing and then you veer off into the gay guys giving kids A.I.D.S. and we're all going to hell in a hand basket because I liked a movie. I'm guessing you're not the kind of person who is fun to take along on long road trips.

"your idea that Christians should spend money to see how bad the world has become" Good point, because the Bible doesn't refer to hardships, personal issues and the difficulty of living in a fallen world.


I can't believe you think the portrayal of Father Janovich was offensive. He was perfectly drawn and Christopher Carley executed the role flawlessly. Father Janovich was patient, persistent and helpful - in other words, he was what all religious leaders should be. He's not perfect and the film shows that, but he is also shown in a respectable light. It has been a very long time since a religious leader has been given an accurate portrayal in film. I'm not sure what you're expecting. But from your comment it would seem you're wanting film to present the world and its inhabitants in some idealized light that has nothing to do with reality.


In closing, I'll repeat my opinion that Gran Torino is a fantastic and moving film. God gave humans the ability to create, to explore and discuss the world that has been made for us. Eastwood's film gives one of the most intelligent and poignant portrayals of race relations in this country in decades. His artistry with this film has not received nearly enough praise and I honestly believe it is worthy of being viewed by any adult. Will there be people who won't like the film for various reasons? Yes. But for the most part I think people will find this to be an enjoyable and more importantly a truthful film.

By the way GPJ, God does not prefer judgment - he prefers obedience. He also prefers love. God is love. Instead of wallowing in anger, why not try extending forgiveness and love? "Fighting back" is a worldly response - showing patience and love and guiding people to the Lord is the proper course.




* - I have no idea what Eastwood's theological viewpoint is. For all I know he's in line to be the Pope.

Labels: comment of the day

From Anonymous:

Labels: comment of the day

Comment fight!

When you post your opinions online you have to expect the whole world to come by and kick you in the soft bits every once in a while. I've become so used to complete strangers saying all kinds of things to me over the most inane comments, mistakes and/or opinions. My favorite is still a woman named Tessa who hoped I would be raped and contract A.I.D.S. over my reivew of The Constant Gardener.

One of the interesting things about running film review site is that many people expect me to have an encyclopedic knowledge of every film I discuss. I will be honest, I am a one man show. I research the films I watch when I can. I pay attention to changes in the market and track rumors and news. This said, I do have a life outside of posting my thoughts on films online and things get past me.

Last month I posted my review of Låt den rätte komma in “Let the Right One In”. To sum up my review, I say it is a smart and great film. It is a genre changer. This said, there is a one second shot of a twelve-year-old's public region. In my review I cite this as being pornography. The scene is simple, a boy opens a door and walks in on his twelve-year-old girl friend. Her lower half is naked and we see her pubic region. This disturbed me because in my book the scene was meant to be sexual in nature. The girl was naked, not nude (nude being the intentional removal of clothes, naked being against one's will). Given the budding relationship between the two characters there was also an obvious sexual overtone to the moment. This pushed the scene into the pornographic realm in my estimation. This understanding that pornography includes exposed flesh, not just overt sexual action.

Well, get someone to post a link to the review on Facebook and let the floodgates open.

People who have no idea what I'm up to, who have no idea my point-of-view are flooding my inbox with all sorts of e-mails and comments.

It is interesting, at least to me , to see the absolute refusal of people to see what I'm trying to say. Perhaps its just that I am incapable of expressing my viewpoint (actually, that's likely the case.) Just the same, there's plenty of huffing and puffing going on, click on this link to read the fun.

Labels: comment of the day, miscellaneous, site news

I'm having a back-and-forth with an Anonymous commenter over my words about one of the Watchmen trailers. The commenter, since he won't give his name (we'll assume he's a he) let's call him Dick. Anyhoo, Dick is irritated that I don't extend an unblinking respect towards the film since "it makes you think." Heck, Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo made me think things too, it doesn't mean I have to praise the heap.

Dick also proposed this morning that...


and then


First I want to thank Dick for his valiant efforts at writing my language. I'd like to hang out with you. You will make my persistent grammar issues seem like a trifle.

Anyone who has read this blog for more than a week should gather three things.

1) I'm not very good at writing
2) I like almost nothing
3) I'm open to all ideas but reject most

Dick makes the assumption I am closed off because I run a site with the word "Christian" attached to it. Dick's confusion is thinking since I'm a Christian I need to bend to the will of others. This is seen in his second comment. This couldn't be further from the truth. Simply because I established this site as "Christian" doesn't mean I intend for others to be pushed aside - I am merely giving an indication of my way of thinking. Trust me, and those who know me understand this to be firmly true, I am willing to let anyone who will listen to me hear my words. However, I don't bend in my beliefs in order to make others happy. This is something non-Christians are always demanding Christians do - tone down, you're making me uncomfortable. You want comfy? Go find a couch. I'm a Christan, I believe if you don't accept Christ you're not saved - YOU SHOULD BE UNCOMFORTABLE. If I didn't get in your face what kind of person would that make me? I believe if you don't turn to Christ you risk your salvation, it would be immoral of me to dismiss my beliefs because it's unsociable. Now, there are ways to approach this situation and be assertive without hammering people in the face with the Bible. I certainly have my conflicts with some brothers and sisters in this regard (here's a hint, making crappy movies doesn't cut it.) But, if I think there's a train coming, I'm going to tell you to get off the tracks. To do otherwise would make me a horrible person.

I bring all of this up because I get a number of comments both on and offline similar to this. A nonbeliever will blab about how restrictive and bigoted Christians are without realizing their denouncements are likewise bigoted. Our opposition claims we shut down opposing thoughts while they shut down what we have to say.

As to the comment "Only judge that you seen and if you have not seen then keep quit." Hey Dick, I've never watched Japanese homosexual pedophile porn but you know what? I'm willing to make the judgment that, as a rule, I think it's a bad idea. Don't believe what you learned in college - its perfectly fine to judge things. Its good to judge. The important thing is to have a definable reason for your judgments and to keep them structured within a clear set of morals. I get comments from non-Christian about judging all the time. They see this is a "Christian" site and think they understand the theology (if they actually understood it they would be Christian already) and don't like that I speak my mind. I often get the line "Judge not lest ye be judged." If you read Matthew 7 you'll find he's not saying don't hold any opinions, its a warning against hypocrisy. I can judge, but I need to be careful and have consistency in my judgments and how I conduct myself in light of making these decisions on others. For example, it would be bad of me to get down on someone else for being a loud mouthed schnook.

What gets me the most is that while I claim this site as being "Christian" I'm hardly drumming the point home every post. I mention it as a description of where I'm coming from. From some of the comments I get you'd think I'm writing every review like I'm some WWJD theo-zombie "Jesus wouldn't like this movie and you're going to burn in the eternal flames of hell."

Alright, back to the movie stuff.

Labels: comment of the day, miscellaneous

Back in April of 2008 I wrote a post about the online petition to get Uwe Boll to stop making films. This morning I received the following rant from Mr. Boll himself:

"Uwe Boll: da haben wir den Salat: in seiner Kindheit drehte schon auf 8 Kamera Filme: was soll denn der Unfug: nichts anderes zu tun: als den Leuten auf die Nerven zu gehen: wir muessen wieder in die Vergangenheit und dort ansetzen: wo der Fehler begann: die Kette ist so stark wie das schwaechste Glied: der Fehler wurde in der Kindheit gemacht: das ist das schwaechste Glied: design, colors: B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: schaut man sich mit der Kamera von Uwe Boll auch nicht an: ich habe mir einige Filme angeschaut: liegt an der Kamera: Y-o-u-t-h W-i-t-h-o-u-t Y-o-u-t-h: hat natuerlich nicht die Qualitaet wie B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: an einem Ort wie: UNUTAMDIM: E-m-r-a-h=Unvergesslich: dabei kommt es auf die Kamera an: die Kamera von: UNUTAMDIM: hat nicht die Qualitaet: von B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: Umbrella: Ain´t No Other Man: design, colors: Qualitaet: waeren alle Filme von Uwe Boll in der Qualitaet von: Gone With The Wind: Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King: ain´t no other man: haette sich auch jeder angeschaut: Kamera: DVD: Poster: der naechste J-a-s-o-n B-o-u-r-n-e und J-o-h-n R-a-m-b-o: ist fuer Uwe Boll: da bin ich gespannt: inweit die sich auch wirklich darum kuemmern: man muss sich darum kuemmern: alle arbeiten sehr hart: und: schaffen tun die es auch: The Secret Garden: waere auch no besser: wenn im Garten Creatures waeren: die nur als Schutz fungieren: zu sehen nur fuer die Zuschauer: diese Creatures aber nicht eingreifen: wuerden die Beteiligten im: Garten: schuetzen: koennen auch den Jungen zum Laufen bringen: auch nur fuer die Zuschauer zu sehen und fuer den Jungen: natuerlich kann man: Benjamin Button: kicken: mit eingebauten Kreaturen.....: die Filme fuer Familien: man darf sich nicht eckeln: tut man sich eckeln: gehen diese Zuschauer verloren: natuerlich braucht auch diese Zuschauer nicht: Wicked Little Things: 30 Days Of Night: ..... : gelangt man mit der Kamera von: Benjamin Button: zum gleichen Ergebnis: 1 Oscar ist ein Punkt von der Academy: aber schwach: Uwe Boll: fuer einen studierten Literaturwissenschaftler: ein Witz: die Buecher muessen auch von Qualitaet sein: Gone With The Wind: Verkauf: genauso wie die Poster: Plakate: Kinoticketverkauf: die Qualitaet der Plakate: damit die DVD´s vermarktet werden: design, colors: ausgeliehen werden: design, colors: geht nur ueber die Qualitaet der Produkte: die Gamefiguren in den Filmen vermeiden: S-E-M-U-M: auch Kombinationen: Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King: ist ein: 11 Oscar Drehbuch: an einigen Stellen erfuellt: B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: nicht die Voraussetzungen fuer 13 oscars: 13 Punkte ist der Film wert: falls Glueck hat der Film: bis zu 13 Oscars moeglich: aber genuegen tuen auch: 9 Oscars: 10 Oscars: 7 Oscars genug: an einem Punkt werdenn die Filme geknackt immer: mache ich alles: aber die alle kuemmern sich auch darum: einen Oscar bekommt immer einn anderer Film: wenn zum Schluss fuer Benjamin Button 5-7-8-11-12: oscars bleiben: genuegt vollkommen: ich bin der einzige Weltweit: der die Kamera 180 % bekommt: design, colors: 180 %: mein Gehirn ist wie die Festplatte eines Computers: wie ein Computer: innerhalb von Bruchteil von Sekunden sehe ich: welcher Kuenstler fuer welchen Film geeignet ist: keiner bekommt die Kamera so hin wie ich: design, colors: Erreichungen aller Nominierungen kann ich nur schaffen: die es ueberhaupt fuer einen Film gibt: damit die Filme auch angeschaut werden: fuer Jury der Academy ist Qualitaet auch von Bedeutung: die versuchen: die Filme zu retten: da wo es nur geht: kann man sich den Soundtrack nicht anhoeren: der Grammy ist die groesste Auszeichnung: nicht der Oscar: rhythm: ain´t no other man: ist ein grammy rhythm: umbrella: two: come away with me: don´t know why: sunrise: sind alle Grammyprodktionen: instruments: rhythm: Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King: genuegt: damit man sich die Filme ungestoert anschauen: geht nur ueber Qualitaet: dann ist da noch die Aussprache: wenn man mit einem Regisseur gerne zusammen arbeiten moechte: ist Voraussetzung: die Aussprache: America=Americanish: England=English: aber auch in America wird english from England akzeptiert: zur Kommunikation gehoert die Aussprache: zum schreibe ich immer: education: i wasn´t born in america and you know the day has and i said: America Fuck You: Too: worldwide: i can feel you: hope you can feel me like i can feel you: you know what i mean: www. you tube com. de: broadcast yourself, search for: California Love: that´s right: break a down: U Can´t Touch This: don´t think about: nobody can´t touch: fast alle Filme sind wie: Making Of Kamera: das darf nicht sein: die Filme: dich einbischen Qualitaet haben: Kamera: Dvd: Poster: werden auch ausgezeichnet: wie auch: Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King: do it better and enjoy the price: Uwe Boll: fuer die Tuerkei ueber 360 Filme geschrieben: das sind bei einem Oscar pro Kinofilm 360 Oscars: man muss sauber arbeiten: bei jeweils drei oder vier oder fuenf Oscars: 1800 Oscars: auch fuer Indien:.....: Germany: T---a---l---i---s---m---a---n: A-m--i---t-a-b--h B---a-c--h-c---h-a--n:......: die alle arbeiten sehr hart: 65 % + 45 %:.....: pro gemachten Kinofilm bekomme ich 1 % von Uwe Boll und da gibt es noch die: fuenf + one + four and afer that seven + three + four: one and three: 10 % and: fouer jeweils 1 %: fuenf Teile hat jeder Film: geht in fuenf Jahren: jedes Jahr einen Teil: man kann aber auch immer 1 % one 10 % und von four 1 %: geht auch: die Filme an Orten wie: UNUTAMADIM: geht ganz einfach: kostet nicht viel: guenstig: und in Qualitaet/// Respect: The Secret Garden///: gefaellt bestimmt: Uwe Boll: waere besser gewesen: B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: und erwaehnt: Der seltsame Fall: Poster:.....: wie: title: Half Light: The Long Kiss Goodnight: B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: un Werbung darauf aufmerksam gemacht: Der seltsame Fall: Poster auch: do what you like but do it right: there are only one life: there is nothing to lose ! "


I don't sprechen Sie Deutsches. All I know is that Babelfish wasn't too kind to his rant:


"Uwe barked: there have we the salad: in its childhood turned already to 8 cameras films: what should then the nonsense: nothing other to do: as the people on the nerves to go: we must again into the past and there prepare: where the mistake began: the chain is as strong as the weakest limb: the mistake was made in the childhood: that is the weakest limb: design, colors: B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: one looks at barked with the camera of Uwe also not: I looked at some films: lies at the camera: Y-o-u-t-h W-i-t-h-o-u-t Y-o-u-t-h: the quality such as B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n has not naturally: at a place such as: UNUTAMDIM: E-m-r-a-h=Unvergesslich: at the same time it arrives on the camera: the camera of: UNUTAMDIM: the quality has not: of B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: Umbrella: Ain´t No Other one: design, colors: Quality: all films of Uwe would be barked in the quality of: Gone With The wind: Lord of The ring: The Return of The King: ain´t no other one: also everyone would have looked at: Camera: DVD: Postal service: the next J-a-s-o-n B-o-u-r-n-e and J-o-h-n R-a-m-b-o: is for Uwe barked: there I am strained: inweit that myself also really therefore worry: one must be concerned therefore: everyone work very hard: and: do create that it also: The Secret corps: also no would be better: if in the garden Creatures were: That only as a protection function: to see only for the spectators: these Creatures however do not interfere: the participants in that would become: Garden: protect: can also the boy for running bring: also only for the spectators to see and for the boy: one naturally can: Benjamin Button: kicken: with incorporated creature. ....: the films for families: one eckeln may not itself: one does himself eckeln: these spectators get lost: naturally does not need also these spectators: Wicked Little Things: 30 Days of Night: .... : One arrives with the camera of: Benjamin Button: to the same result: 1 Oscar is a point of the Academy: but weakly: Uwe barked: for a studied literary critic: a joke: the books must be also of quality: Gone With The wind: Sale: just as the postal service: Placards: Movie theater ticket sale: the quality of the placards: therewith the DVD´s marketed become: design, colors: loaned become: design, colors: goes only over the quality of the products: avoid the Gamefiguren in the films: S-E-M-U-M: also combinations: Lord of The ring: The Return of The King: is on: 11 Oscar scripts: at some places fulfills: B-e-n-j-a-m-i-n B-u-t-t-o-n: not the prerequisites for 13 oscars: The film is 13 points valued: if good fortune the film has: up to 13 Oscars possible: but suffice doing also: 9 Oscars: 10 Oscars: 7 Oscars enough: at a point werdenn the films cracked always: I make all: but that everyone are concerned also therefore: an Oscar gets always einn other film: if to the end for Benjamin Button 5-7-8-11-12: oscars remain: suffices perfectly: I am that only worldwide: that the camera 180% gets: design, colors: 180% : my brain is like the hard disk of a computer: like a computer: within fraction of seconds, I see: which artist for which film suited is: none gets the camera so there like I: design, colors: Can I : that it generally gives: therewith also looked at become: is quality : that try: : there where it : can one : is : not : rhythm: ´one: is : umbrella: two: : Served´t know why: sunrise: all Grammyprodktionen are: instrument: rhythm: Lord of The ring: The Return of The King: suffices: therewith one the films undisturbed look at: goes only over quality: then yet the pronunciation is there: if one would like to work with a director gladly together: prerequisite is: the pronunciation: America = Americanish: England = English: but also in America, english from England is accepted: to the communication belongs the pronunciation: to that, I write always: education: i wasn´t born in America and you know the day has and i said: America f**ked You: Too: worldwide: i can feel you: hope you can feel me like i can feel you: you know what i mean: www. you tube com. de: broadcast yourself, search for: California Love: that´s right: break a down: U Can´t Touch This: don´t think about: nobody can´t touch: fast all films are how: Making OF camera: that may not be: the films: you einbischen quality have: Camera: DVD: Poster: are also distinguished: like also: Lord OF The of ring: The Return OF The King: DO it better and enjoy the price: Uwe Boll: for Turkey over 360 films written: those are with a OSCAR per motion picture film those are with a OSCAR per motion picture film 360 Oscars: one must operate cleanly: with in each case three or four or five Oscars: 1800 Oscars: also for India: ….: Germany: T--A--l--i--s--m--A--n: To--i--t-a-b--h B--AC--HC--hectar--n: ......: all this operate very hard: 65% 45%: ….: per made motion picture film I get + one + four and after that seven + three + four: one and three: 10 % and: more fouer in each case 1%: each film has five sections: goes in five years: each year a section: in addition, one can do always 1% one 10% and of four 1%: goes also: the films at places how: UNUTAMADIM: goes completely simply: much does not cost: favorably: and in quality Respect: The Secret guards: pleases certainly: Uwe Boell: would have been better: . B. - u-t-t-o-n: and mentions: The strange case: Poster: ….: how: Light helped: The Long Kiss Goodnight: . B. - u-t-t-o-n: un advertisement on it attentively made: The strange case: Poster also: do what you like but do it right: there are only one life: there is nothing to lose !"

"the chain is as strong as the weakest limb" indeed. I think he's telling me...actually, I have no idea what he's telling me.

Labels: comment of the day, miscellaneous, Uwe Boll