Looking for a specific film review? CLICK BELOW

0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z / Trailers / DVD Store


November 13, 2008
Find Me Guilty (2006)
Should I see it?
No.


Short Review:
Praise worthy performances – a shame worthy film.

Find Me Guilty

Jack DiNorscio (Vin Diesel) is a known mobster is up on charges of conspiracy. DiNorscio and his partners in crime are party to the longest criminal court case in American history. This means it was an extremely expensive trial that spent the efforts of prosecutors, the jury, the defense lawyers and the court for over two years. All of this to nail a group of men who the prosecution insisted were involved in all sorts criminal activity. Jack, a mobster with a broad and appealing personality, decides to defend himself. As the trial lingers, Jack’s courtroom antics cause trouble for both the prosecution and the defense.

Diesel’s performance is remarkable primarily because it is Diesel giving the performance and it doesn't stink. In an obvious attempt to step away from being pigeonholed in the no-mind action films he has become known for (Pitch Black, xXx, The Fast & The Furious) Diesel manages to show he has enough talent to help out a more serious production,. He handles the comedic aspects of Jack’s personality easily. Where Diesel’s performance does best is when he is out of the courtroom or confronting a serious situation. Diesel’s transitions seamlessly from court jester to a man concerned with his own fate. I was rather surprised, I thought he was only capable of grunting and pointing. He's not going to win an Oscar, but this film should open him up to headier stuff than Babylon A.D. and The Pacifier.

Peter Dinklage also gives a believable performance as defense attorney Ben Klandis. Dinklage (The Station Agent, Elf) is at once a confident power-attorney, while also being someone dealing criminal riff raff. Much of the court case is completely out of his hands. Dinklage (buttressed by Sidney Lumet’s sharp script) plays the duality of this role with deft.

This film as a whole is very well done. The problem is that the film asks the audience to cheer for the bad guys. Again, this is a trail of mobsters and the audience is manipulated to loathe the prosecution and cheer for the mobsters to be set free. To his credit Lumet goes out of his way to make certain we understand these men on trial are murderers and thieves. To his shame he doesn’t condemn the men for their crimes.

I recommend this film is strong cautions. Like Pirates of The Caribbean, this film uses the force of personality to get the audience to embrace bad men and despise good ones. This is an entertaining and well-crafted film but be wary of its moral retardation.


Related Reviews:
Vin Diesel movies
Saving Private Ryan (1998)
The Pacifier (2005)


Other Critic's Reviews:
ReelViews
Reel.com



Labels: , , , , , ,



Share






November 12, 2008
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead (2007)
Should I see it?
Yes, but with caution.



This is so well done that I still recommend this movie despite the fact that you see Philip Seymour Hoffman's bubble-gum butt. Right there in the opening scene, flabby Phil completely naked having sex with an equally naked Marisa Tomei. The "ewww" factor is off the scales. The thing is that not only is this scene disturbing to the core, it is also completely unneeded. There is no reason it needed to be shot the way it was. The same concepts could have been projected without having to show Phil's stretch marks.

Director Sidney Lumet (Network, Dog Day Afternoon, The Verdict, Fail-Safe) masterfully commands this film about a pair of brothers who have their lives ruined after they fatally screw up robbing their parent's jewelry store. He gives us an intimate film with little intrusion, just pure character and performance. Lumet dips into a distracting editing sequence to indicate flashbacks and time shifts. These jolts break in and unfortunately remind us we're watching fiction. Other than this awkward choice, Lumet is dead-on with his delivery and provides one of the most engrossing movies of his career.

I am pressed to think of any recent film that manages such a collection of strong performances. Ethan Hawke, who I've never considered to be a strong talent shows his skills in his role as Hank Hanson, a nervous loser who owes money all over the place and doesn't have the means to make it up legally. Hawke has lost his boyish looks and his face is getting ragged with age. He looks perfect for this role, thin, pale and tired. His performance is a sympathetic one but he doesn't make Hank an endearing man. He's just a pathetic lost cause. Hawke nails the man's desperation and fear. Hank is a man-boy who obviously has spent his life trembling in the shadow of his overbearing brother Andy (Philip Seymour Hoffman). Hoffman brings yet another memorable performance to the screen as the alpha dog Andy but in their scenes, it is Hawke who surprisingly shines as Hank melts under the pressure from his big brother. Albert Finney likewise gives a heart aching turn as Charles, the father of Andy and Hank, and the victim of their awful crime. As Charles slowly pieces together the plot against him, the tension builds. Finney is understated and so real in this role. Hawke, Finney and Hoffman mix together perfectly and Lumet does the right thing, he steps back and let's the three do their work.

This is the debut screenplay by playwright Kelly Masterson. This may be the most impressive screenwriting debut in years. Forget about Diablo Cody, she writes cute stuff and is easy to serve to the press. Masterson is the real deal. Someone who can pen characters with this much verisimilitude is someone to watch and watch closely. There is a scene between Charles and Andy where the two men, father and son, get to the core of their relationship. It is a small scene and it is low key, but Masterson packs it with an stunning amount of emotion without falling into dramatics.

This is not a film for everyone. It is one of the best crime dramas I've ever seen but it is loaded with low behavior. Those who are wary of violence, cursing, scenes with drug use, nudity and frank sexuality will find plenty to avoid here. Lumet and company pull no punches and everything is laid out to be seen. If you're sensitive to questionable content, this is just not your film. If you are okay with seeing some rough stuff, and you enjoy literate films this is one you should put to the top of your list.


Related Reviews:
Philip Seymour Hoffman movies
The Big Lebowski (1998)
Capote (2005)


Other Critic's Reviews:
eFilmCritic
Critical Culture

Labels: , , , , , ,



Share






November 11, 2008
Fail-Safe (1964)
Should I see it?
Yes.

Fail-Safe

A very theatrical and thought provoking cold war film. American planes have been sent to bomb Moscow due to an electrical malfunction. Director Sidney Lumet provides a gripping drama that has dated quite well. The performances by Henry Fonda, Walter Matthau and Dan O'Herlihy are vibrant and fill out this fine production. If you're sick of flippant, dimwitted Hollywood flicks this is a good shot in the arm.

This movie also sports one of the greatest nightmare sequences ever filmed.



Related Reviews:
Cold War movies
The Hunt for Red October (1990)
War Games (1983)


Other Critic's Reviews:

FilmCritic.com
DVD Verdict



Labels: , , , ,



Share