Short Review: Everything they did right in the first movie, they did wrong in this one.


In this follow up to Iron Man, director Jon Favreau comes down with a serious case of the sophomore blues. The original film had a sarcastic edge that smoothed out a clunky but still enjoyable plot. The origin story of Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr) introduced an externally belligerent/internally weak man who finds the cure for his mid-life crisis. In the original Stark is forced to beat down his past self, personified by his business partner Obadiah Stane (Jeff Bridges). This outing avoids all of that messy character stuff and focuses on lots of loud noises, flashing lights and Scarlett Johansson in a body sock.

Tony Stark returns having achieved world peace thanks to his use of the Iron Man suit. At least, that is what we're told. We never get to actually see him protect the world. It's all explained in a Senate hearing. This makes Stark's hero work an abstract. This in turn makes it meaningless. If it is not on the screen, it doesn't exist for the audience.

The screenplay by Justin Theroux clearly explains that the world is at peace in the opening moments. One would then expect that in turn this world peace would be threatened. Nope. Stark is attacked by Ivan Vanko (Mickey Rourke), a Russian physicist with a grudge. Vanko's personal vendetta is funded by Stark's weapons manufacturer rival Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell). World peace is never actually threatened. The only things threatened in this story are the egos of a bunch of scummy super-geniuses. This does not make for a riveting central conflict.

This lack of stakes is the main reason the film fails so completely. Theroux doesn't paint himself into narrative corners, he paints himself out of the whole room. He is so busy introducing characters for the upcoming Avengers movie and fumbling with technological presentations that he almost doesn't have time shoehorn in any actual characterization.

There are numerous scriptural issues that make the story fall flat. This is evidenced in Stark giving up his company in the first act. Once he does this he has literally nothing to lose. At no time does he find it critical to get his company back. It is just something that happens. If it has no deeper value, why does Theroux involve it in the film?

At one point Hammer tells Vanko to take Stark's "legacy" from him. How does the audience know when his "legacy" is taken away? We are given a statement of action by the villains and it involves a motive no less intangible than them saying they're going to hurt Stark's feelings. This is poor writing.

Vanko's whole motivation is a vacuum. Favreau gives us enough to understand that Vanko is fueled by revenge, but this revenge is hollow because we don't understand its cause. This results in Vanko being little more than another hurdle Stark must overcome instead of a villain to confront. (Spoiler warning) This is why at the end, Stark so easily overcomes Vanko and his droid army and why Vanko's death has zero dramatic punch. He is a non-entity. (Spoiler done)

The film also lacks any symbolism or meaning. In the original we were given the cheesy, but effective symbol of Stark's heart. Does Tony Stark have a heart? Yes, and its sitting in this little glass box. It is a symbol that is referred to and played upon throughout the entire film.

In this film, Favreau sets up a similar conceit. Stark is literally being poisoned by his suit. While the suit gives him fame and glory, it is also making him more toxic (both literally and figuratively). This is a solid metaphor and it is strongly established early on. It is then left unused.

One would hope that when they set up in the first act that Tony Stark and Iron Man are one in the same and that he gains so much through wearing the suit, that in the end he would have to discard the suit in order to complete his heroic task. This would make Stark the real Iron Man and make the suit his accessory, instead of it being the other way around. No such luck.

Overall, this version of the film is an incomplete draft of what should have been a more enjoyable production. It stinks of something that was rushed to market. This is not a good movie. Its not even a passable one. The film ultimately becomes an elongated teaser trailer for the upcoming The Avengers movie, hitting screens in 2012.

Labels: Don Cheadle, Jon Favreau, Mickey Rourke, Robert Downey Jr, Sam Rockwell, Samuel L Jackson, Scarlett Johansson, sequel, superhero

Screenwriter: Justin Theroux (Tropic Thunder)
Director: Jon Favreau (Zathura: A Space Adventure)
Actors: Robert Downey Jr. (Chaplin), Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler), Gwyneth Paltrow (Shakespeare in Love), Scarlett Johansson (The Island), Don Cheadle (Ocean's 11), Sam Rockwell (Moon), Samuel L. Jackson (Snakes on a Plane), Paul Bettany (The Da Vinci Code), Kate Mara (Transibberian), Jon Favreau (Swingers) and Garry Shandling (What Planet Are You From?) and Olivia Munn

Labels: Don Cheadle, film, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jon Favreau, Kate Mara, Mickey Rourke, movie trailer, Paul Bettany, Robert Downey Jr, Sam Rockwell, Samuel L Jackson, Scarlett Johansson

Christopher Nolan (Memento, Insomnia, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight) is clearly one of the best of his generation of American directors. This film is further testament to his deft hand at the art of directing and for his ability to reduce intricate narratives to consumable and enjoyable films.

This film tells the story of a dueling duo of turn-of-the-century illusionists. The two ramp up their efforts to upstage one another to a point of ridiculous extremes and, of course, end up hurting everyone around them in the process. While this may not seem like much of a concept, the script (by Nolan and his brother Jonathan Nolan) is actually quite well done. The two illusionists Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman) and Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) are complicated men and this film has the patience to allow both Jackman and Bale the opportunity to get into their characters and flesh them out. The competition between the two men is reasonable at first but quickly takes an extreme turn. The lengths at which these men go to out do the other are so obtuse they could easily overtake the film and push it into being laughable. Because Nolan’s script and direction allow for Jackman and Bale a patient forum to explain these men, the film doesn't suffer from its excesses.

The concepts of the duality of man fill this production. Each person, with the exception of the God-figure Cutter (Michael Caine) an illusion engineer and stage manager, each character is swamped in dual roles that thwart their happiness. Their professional aspirations and their private need for vengeance trap the men. They are stuck creating great works in order to destroy their enemy. Olivia (Scarlett Johansson), a stagehand who gets wrapped up in the lives of these illusionists, finds herself being a lover to both men while deceiving them both in due course. Even the central illusion of the piece belays the dual nature theme. Both men obsess over a trick known as “The Transported Man” which is an impossible illusion involving body doubles. Nolan plays out his themes and symbolism with careful direction. Unlike many of his contemporaries, Nolan’s voice never shouts over his work.

Looking at the this overall, it is a wonderfully executed and smart work and matches Nolan’s other efforts. The performances across the board are very strong and inviting. Comparisons to the film The Illusionist is unavoidable. Both are haunting tales about turn-of-the-century stage magicians and were released practically side by side. This film has a smarter edge and better acting. The other is far more attractive and sports a superior final act. Between the two however, this film wins. With the quality of the performances, along with Nolan's clever hands holding the reigns, this film gives more to its audience. Even with its rather obvious final act this piece still finishes with a greater satisfaction.


Related Reviews:
Christian Bale movies
Rescue Dawn (2006)
Harsh Time (2005)


Other Critic's Reviews:
In Film Australia
Film Critics United

Labels: Christian Bale, Christopher Nolan, film, Hugh Jackman, Michael Caine, movie review, Scarlett Johansson

In his recent book Everything Bad Is Good for You: How Today's Popular Culture Is Actually Making Us Smarter, Steven Johnson argues that today's movies and television shows are much more complicated than in days of yore and that this sophistication exercises our brains in beneficial ways. I'm not sure I agree with the thesis, but exhibit A in his defense might be The Prestige, an enjoyable and interesting film nearly spoiled by needless complication.

The movie takes place in the late 19th century and involves two aspiring stage magicians who start out as friends, but become bitter rivals. They are obsessed with discovering each other's tricks, while each plots to sabotage the other's act. The period setting and the focus on illusionists and their techniques together with the revenge and obsession angle make for a very agreeable combination. The films creators, however, tell the story in a way that makes the first half very difficult to follow. Make sure your soda is caffeinated, not in order to stay awake, but because you will need every bit of mental acuity to keep up.

The central problem is that the story is told in flashbacks from a main plot line. There are, however, two separate flashback threads, one that starts at the beginning of the protagonists careers (thread A), and one that begins much later (thread B). Thread A is further fractured by constant cuts between the separate activities of the two rivals. Matters are not helped by the fact that thread B and the main plot line both have the two men reading each other's notebooks. Now add three actresses who all look as if they could be sisters, and you can begin to understand the challenge. At times I felt like a pilot in a fancy new jet fighter, whose acrobatics were impressive, but the G forces drained the blood from my head. Fortunately, the theater was equipped with inflatable leg cuffs that kept me from passing out.

Despite the foregoing, the plot and characters were compelling enough to make me want to stick with it. The plot was coherent in spite of the way it unfolded. The ending involved the resolution of two interlocking mysteries. The film handled one half of this pair perfectly. The writers signaled the other half far too early and drained the finale of some surprise, but this is a minor criticism.

One of the more enjoyable aspects of the film is piecing together the many connections, foreshadowing, and allusions after you leave the theater. This is the kind of movie that could pay rewatching. Since I invariable watch a movie the first time for the plot, and subsequent times for outstanding dialog and characterization, I'll probably pass on that, as the script and acting are serviceable, but not stellar.

I recommend this film for its many pleasures, but it will make you work for them. Whether it will make you smarter is different question.


Related Reviews:
Christian Bale movies
Rescue Dawn (2006)
Harsh Time (2005)


Other Critic's Reviews:
In Film Australia
Film Critics United

Labels: Christian Bale, Christopher Nolan, film, guest review, Hugh Jackman, Michael Caine, movie review, Scarlett Johansson

Screenwriters: Abby Kohn and Marc Silverstein
Director: Ken Kwapis (License to Wed)
Actors: Jennifer Aniston (Derailed), Jennifer Connelly (Dark Water), Scarlett Johansson (Match Point), Drew Barrymore (50 First Dates), Ginnifer Goodwin, Ben Affleck (Hollywoodland), Justin Long (Idiocracy), Kris Kristofferson (The Jacket) and Kevin Connelly (The Notebook)

Labels: Ben Affleck, film, Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Connelly, Justin Long, Kris Kristofferson, movie trailer, Scarlett Johansson

The more I see of this film the dumber it looks. I can't think of the last time I have been this underwhelmed with an upcoming release. It just looks embarrassing. They all but have Samuel L Jackson wearing a chicken suit.




Screenwriters: Frank Miller (300) and Will Eisner
Director: Frank Mille (Sin City)
Actors: Scarlett Johansson (Match Point), Eva Mendez (We Own the Night), and Samuel L. Jackson (Snakes on a Plane)

Labels: adaptation, Eva Mendes, Frank Miller, movie trailer, Samuel L Jackson, Scarlett Johansson

Screenwriters: Frank Miller (300) and Will Eisner
Director: Frank Mille (Sin City)
Actors: Scarlett Johansson (Match Point), Eva Mendez (We Own the Night), and Samuel L. Jackson (Snakes on a Plane)

Labels: adaptation, Eva Mendes, Frank Miller, movie trailer, Samuel L Jackson, Scarlett Johansson