Seth Rogen has cut out a niche for himself. As he did with Knocked Up, he portrays a stumbling loser who is completely amoral and emotionally stagnant. He’s a lovable loser however because he knows he’s a lost cause and is able to find humor in his pathetic existence. Actually, his character in this film, Dale Denton, is almost exactly like his character Ben Stone from Knocked Up with the only exception is that he’s just a little more pathetic this time around. Dale is a bumbling part time process server, fulltime pothead. He has a lousy job, wastes his time smoking dope and hangs out with his girlfriend who is still in high school, he’s much older. After buying a new brand of pot that has hit town called Pineapple Express from his wheezing pot dealer Saul (James Franco) Dale witnesses local drug kingpin Ted (Gary Cole) murder a competitor. Dale and Saul spend the rest of the film being chased by Ted’s thugs. Essentially, this production attempts to combine a pot comedy like Up in Smoke or Half-Baked with the simple structured comedic action-adventure film like Hot Fuzz or The Blues Brothers. The combination is possible to pull off, but in this case it fails.

The film fails because it’s just not very funny. It is amusing in spots, but the script and performances lack any life. For most of the film there’s sarcastic interaction in place of wit, buttressed by sophomoric physical humor. Screenwriters Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg (Superbad) avoid mining any humor from their scenes and stick to offering awkward juxtapositions instead. Everyone in the film is a softy, concerned about being friendly and not having their feelings hurt. Drug dealers are openly worried whether people like them or not. Hired killers complain they’re not spending enough time with their family. Characters capable of ruthlessly shooting people are easy to get misty eyed over insensitive remarks. These character contrasts are played over and over until they become wearisome. The entire cast literally acts like eleven year old boys deciding they’re going to be friends. While this may be amusing at first, it quickly loses its edge and it becomes clear Rogen and Goldberg don’t have any other tricks up their sleeve.

The final act of the film is a complete mess thanks to a lack of consistency. The final act revolves around a prolonged gunfight. This battle is rather violent. Is it way over the top, ala Tarantino? No, there isn’t too much here most audiences haven’t seen before. The issue with the final fight sequence is that it is starkly different from the previous portions of the film. There was violence in the first acts but the overall tone of the movie was still lighthearted and the violence was displayed within that frame. The final act removes the humor and tries to portray itself as a full out action movie. Director David Gordon Green mishandles this transformation and ends up delivering a nonsensical flurry of guns and death. Given the half-man losers he has as his heroes, this transformation is also lacking any logic. You can't say the hero is a pothead dolt who is sent into a panic because he’s scared of being a dark woods alone and then have him magically discover the internal fortitude to single-handily attack a gang of drug runners. It doesn’t work.

To sum up, if you are lacking any standards and pretty much thoughtlessly consume whatever comes down the pipe, you’ll probably enjoy yourself with this film. If you’re a little more discerning, say by wanting actual jokes or at least something clever, you’re out of luck. This is a very predictable and unoriginal film. Yes, there’s not that many pothead action films out there, but you’ve seen these characters and situations under different name a hundred times before.



Related Reviews:
James Franco movies
Annapolis (2004)
Spider-Man 2 (2004)


Other Critic’s Reviews:
Cinema Verdict
Cineopinion

Labels: comedy, Danny McBride, drugs, film, Gary Cole, James Franco, movie review, Seth Rogen

I have mixed feelings about this film. Ridley Scott is a workman who has dutifully made very dense, impressive films. His best movies (Gladiator, Black Hawk Down, Thelma & Louise, Blade Runner, Alien) are strongly constructed and very direct. When he is on he is one of the most confident storytellers making movies today and I think that is his real appeal. These films don't wander, they choose their path and he mines the narrative for all it's worth. This, and his heroes tend to be blue collar in their thinking and manner. This outing is a little different. He seems less secure in his story and the whole film suffers from a lack of focus.

The film tells the story of Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington), a drug dealing crime boss who in the 1970's began funneling heroin from Vietnam to the United States. This was done by bribing military men to do his smuggling for him. Working against Lucas is Det. Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe), an incorruptable cop with a failing marriage and a ex-partner who overdosed on Lucas' product. A third branch of the film comes from the horribly corrupt police department fronted by the threatening Detective Trupo (Josh Brolin). Everything is there to make one heck of a story, multi-dimensional characters, strong motives, a grand scale. Scott missteps however in his choice of focus. He concentrates on Lucas' part of the story. While this means we get an opportunity to watch Washington dig his teeth into a meaty role (something not as common as it should be) it also means we are cheering on the bad guy. Lucas is the hero of the story, Roberts (the real hero) is cast as the villain. Do not understand, Roberts isn't portrayed as evil, he's actually quite sympathetic, he is the villain when we look at the narrative's structure. Since Roberts isn't a real bad guy, Scott is forced to drag in the corrupt cops and Dect. Trupo to play this role. This makes the narrative a little cockeyed and other areas suffer for it. First, Robert's failing marriage becomes a unconnected distraction to the rest of the story. This could have been a meaningful and rich area but it comes across as shoehorned since the topic is only visited instead of explored due to time constraints. Moreover, Lucas and Roberts as men are not as deeply investigated as they should be because so much time needs to be spent jumping from one avenue of the story to the next. ***SPOILER*** By the end of the film, Lucas is caught and imprisoned. He turns on his hard won business, and it is noted that Roberts eventually defends the man in court. This remarkable turnaround mentioned in passing before the final credits is confusing because there is nothing in the film that hints that this would ever happen. A shocking turn like this should be born out by the nature of the character, there is little in the actual film to explain what happened in real life after the story drops off.

Overall, the film is a good watch but it fails to be a great film. The awkward script asks too much of the audience and despite the wonderful scene work and strong performances, the film fails to deliver as much as it could. It's better than most but still faulty.


Cautions: There's tons of violence, drug use and swearing.


Worldview: The following of the criminal instead of the cop doesn't make this a bad movie. It is obvious that a criminal can make an effective hero (Godfather II leaps to mind). There needs to be a coming to Jesus moment however. The criminal needs to acknowledge his deeds, to be held to account. This film has this scene in the end, but it feels flat due to a lack of depth. Lucas is shown to be a criminal but he's not often shown to be acting criminally. He kills a man on screen but this man is a competing thug who is clearly menacing him. It comes off as more of self-defense even though he murders the man in cold blood. Since Lucas' crimes are watered down to make him more appealing, the power of his confession loses much of it's punch. This final conversation is a gentle twack upside the head of the audience alerting them that while we have been on the side of the criminal, what he is doing is indeed evil. This film doesn't come out in favor of murder and selling drugs. But it doesn't necessarily clearly condemn it either. When we look at the film's portrayal of almost all cops as being on the take and shown to be more villainous than the drug dealers the movie's finale is morally muddled and therefore misleading.


Related Reviews:
Denzel Washington movies
Fallen (1998)
Deja Vu (2006)


Other Critic's Reviews:
Creative Loafing
Screen It!

Labels: cops, Denzil Washington, drugs, film, mob, movie review, Russell Crowe

Labels: cops, drugs, Eva Mendes, film, Joaquin Phoenix, Mark Wahlberg, mob, movie review, Robert Duvall