Newgnfr: The Passion of the Christ (2004) Christian film reviews

Looking for a specific film review? CLICK BELOW

0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z / Trailers / DVD Store

June 10, 2010

The Passion of the Christ (2004)

Should I see it?

Yes, with caution.

Short Review: One of the best films ever made. What else can be said?

This film proves that the most controversial figure in human history is Christ Jesus. Even a film about Him stirs up all manner of emotions.

Mel Gibson's masterwork is a challenging film. It is an unflinching look at the torments in the last day of Jesus' life. The brutality shown in the film is the biggest takeaway for both the believer and non-believer. The audience is asked to endure a prolonged torture sequence, graphically displayed in all of its crimson horror. To some this is little more than a sick torture porn flick dressed up in religious clothing. To others it is frank and gut wrenching reminder of the sacrificed paid by our Savior. Obviously, I fall in the second camp.

The Passion of the Christ is one of the most important films made. First, it is a brilliant film both technically and artistically. It stands head and shoulders above most films and rises to the level of other great films of our age such as Schindler's List or Saving Private Ryan. The film also reinvigorated Christian film. Following the stellar success of this film, the concept of the "passion dollar" came into being. "Passion dollars" refers to the ability of faith-based groups and individuals to create massive profits at the box office. Since 2004, studios have been chasing down these people, hoping to replicate Gibson's unbelievable success.

This film also stands as perhaps the most touching, realistic portrayal of Christ ever to be presented. James Caviezel, speaking the original Aramaic, gives an authentic dimension to his Christ that has been missing in all other portrayals. Generally, Jesus is shown as a glowing, stoic figure. Caviezel opens the human aspect of Christ, showing his love as well as his leadership. Through Caviezel, we can see how Jesus could reach so many in such a short time.

Another outstanding performance comes from Maia Morgenstern as Mary. Morgenstern, overlooked by the Academy, provides one of the most striking performances in years. Through her we experience the horrors of Christ. She is the audience's emotional usher throughout the film. Her pain as a mother and as a Christ-follower is difficult to see and Morgenstern deserves high praise for bringing this complicated character to screen.

This is a film everyone should see at least once. While not something you want to sit down with while chomping on popcorn, it is important and moving enough to warrant at least a single viewing - believer or not.

Cautions: This film shows the final moments of Christ's life. The Roman's didn't hug Him to death. There is graphic scenes of torture and brutality. Strong, strong caution should be applied here. This not for the kiddies or anyone who has just eaten a sloppy Joe.

Worldview: The Christian reaction to the film has been interesting to see. They are, at first, very defensive of the piece. They also tend to treat the film as something that is nearly holy. While I understand why Christians are so closely attached to this film, I find myself a little concerned.

Christian artists’ commission is to allow The Holy Spirit to inform their work. This doesn’t mean our work should always blatantly tell the story of Christ. It should however always be mindful to present The Word in some fashion to the audience. We should also endeavor to keep Christ before us when we work. The work should be for Him, not for ourselves. This is easier said than done.

While this film puts Christ first, much of the marketing places the emphasis on the artist. The issue I find myself struggling with is exactly where the line between embracing a work of Christian art and worshiping the artist for his/her work?

Gibson obvious deserves praise for his efforts, but at the end of the day this isn’t his film. If you are like me and believe the hand of providence has touched this production, then falling over yourself praising Gibson is misplacing your heart. Christian art is not about the artist. It is about Christ and it is Christ who should be praised for the work. Gibson, as brilliant as his work is, is merely the vessel of God as are the rest of us.

Often I see Christians using this film as a touchstone to show the modern bias against Christian expression. While there may be a bias, this film should be used by Christians to show how that bias is a thin veil that can be torn through with the Truth of The Word. Yes, we have our enemies in the Arts, but we should not allow our sinful desires for attention (in this case the negative attention of playing the victim) to keep us from praising The Lord.

Enjoy this film. It is one of the great works of art in decades. All I ask is that you don’t forget who really brought it before you and why.

Related Reviews:
Mel Gibson movies
The Road Warrior (1981)
What Women Want (2000)

Other Critic's Reviews:
ReelViews
ScreenIt!

Click here to buy your copy of

You Are What You See and learn
to change the world from your couch

Labels: film, Jesus Christ, Jim Caviezel, Mel Gibson, Monica Bellucci, movie review

0 Comments:

Post a Comment