Should I see it?
Please, no.
Short Review: I really wanted to like this movie. Then again, I would like to be able to sing like Bono. I don’t think either one are going to work out for me.I want to state than I know nothing of Joss Whedon’s television series Firefly. Never saw it, don’t care to. My opinions of this film are free of any fanboy giddiness or any preconceptions other than I heard many great things about this film after its release. I have been seeing so many crappy films as of late; I was looking forward to seeing something worthwhile.My search continues.As I mentioned, this film stems from a television show. The film’s writer/director Joss Whedon is wildly successful in television, with Firefly, Buffy The Vampire Slayer and Angel under his belt. His writing has been cherished by many and he has amassed an army of fans. I don’t get it.Whedon’s script for this film is nearly unbearable with its paper-thin characters and hokey dialog. This writing would serve a short form well but doesn’t play at all when you’re working with it for two hours. Think of it this way: my reviews are bitter and poorly written, but they are brief (usually). Can you imagine how awful it would be to have to read my ramblings for ten pages? The lesson here is what works on TV doesn’t always work in film. While this film does offer a good introduction to the material for the uninitiated, it fails to impress once you get to know it. The acting is substandard and the production looks cheap. It is obvious much of the budget went into securing the original actors from the series, and into six or seven expensive FX shots. On the whole, this production looks and feels like it belongs on the SciFi Channel. I kept waiting for the BowFlex or Miller Lite ads to come on. Even if you look past the wooden dialog and community theater acting (excepting lead actor Nathan Fillion who fits his role well – except I kept thinking “isn’t that the guy who sang for Crowded House back in the 80’s?”) there is the insipid morality presented by this twaddle. The worldview and theology set forth by this piece is something I would expect to hear coming out of high school students (and not the bright ones). If you are a Christian, this film should turn you sour. If you’re a Christian and you don’t have a problem with the ideas this film puts out, you need to go back and read your Bible again…all of it.The one notable Christian character is of course called Shepherd Book. The lame half thoughts this guy kicks out are embarrassingly sophmoric. An example of the wondrous wisdom pouring from this loser’s maw is his dying words to his atheist friend “I don’t care what you believe, just believe it!” Sounds Christian to me. “Sure, Christ died for your sins and you are redeemed only through him, but that’s just me, I’m silly that way. You believe what you want. Hey, you want to believe this cigarette lighter is God? Okay, as long as you believe it! It doesn’t matter in the end.” The script goes out of its way to set up this guy as being a Christian and then falsely portrays the theology. My spite for the worldview of the film is deeper than just how ignorant Weldon is about my faith. The film presents truly vile characters as heroic and that is always bad. The characters are lying, murdering fiends that live for themselves. In the end, the message is that the only thing one needs to believe in is “love”. Which, if you’re running around the universe murdering and thieving, this makes sense. You don’t want to submit yourself to God or any one else who’s going to hold you accountable.If you have children who want to watch this film, I’d suggest keeping them from it. Beyond the post-modern philosophy you will have to contend with brutality, and bad lighting. There are needless references to sexuality and scenes of bloody violence in a film that should have been purely geared towards younger audiences. These items may be a problem for many parents along with the continual question “Mom, Dad, why are all of the camera shots so poorly laid out?” “He’s used to shooting for television, Son. He’ll learn…he’ll learn.”
Related Reviews:
Science Fiction movies
The Star Wars films
The Alien films
Other Critic's Reviews:
Celluloid Heroes
Combustible Celluloid
Labels: film, Joss Whedon, movie review, Nathan Fillion
6 Comments:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
Do not listen to this man. He knows nothing whereof he speaks (much like his opinions about the big message in Memento).
Yes, I'm a fanboy. BUT this movie was loved by many who had never heard of Firefly or Joss Whedon.
And my review has the links to prove it.
Scott, you drive me crazy. I will say it again ...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
:-D
I agree with you Julie D. Scott, I'm sorry but you are a moron. I had never heard of firefly before I went and saw Serenity. I only went to see it because I loved Joss' work from Buffy and Angel. I fell in love with Joss' world and the characters he created and it made me go and buy the Firefly series and made me what I am today, "a big damn browncoat"!!!!
I aim to misbehave.
Shiny!!
*sigh* I'll refrain from calling you a moron because I know you are an intelligent person, Scott. Our opinions seem to diverge greatly on most movies. ;) I do, however, feel compelled to defend Serenity. I won't because you didn't watch Firefly. Christianity plays a huge role in the series and it was next to impossible to translate what the characters learned, took to heart and discarded regarding faith. There was so much mystery surrounding Shepherd Book in the series that was never solved. His statement to Mal upon his death (though I personally disagree with him) could have been a result of that mystery. The characters mirror people in that they all have different beliefs and ways of dealing.
I loved Serenity and believe if the series had lasted several seasons the movie would have been a more rounded piece of work.
homo.
you sir are stupid, I went to go see this movie without knowing about either the director or his previous work. I had never heard of Firefly much less seen it and this was still a great movie, great comedy, good acting, great story. I dont know whats not to love but i question if you even saw the movie if you didnt like it that much.
Chris,
First, thank you for making me confident in my grasp of basic grammar.
You've obviously given this much thought and consideration. So much so that you have figured me out. No, I haven't seen the movie, which is exactly why I am so ready to give it a negative review. You've seen right through my clever plan of citing specific details to support my claim in order to give the illusion of having sat through the entire picture. I stand humiliated by your insight.
As for "what's not to love", give the review another once over and that should clear that up for you. Thanks for stopping in.
Post a Comment
<< Home